How do we make an interactive website work without a mouse?

Keyboard-operable, screen-reader-recognisable controls are the foundation of an accessible interactive website. Start with native browser elements where possible, ensure every custom interaction can be reached and used without a mouse, and avoid movement or timed content that users cannot control. Build inclusion into design and development from the beginning.

Digital illustration on a dark background showing a winding white path extending downward from a browser window with a photo of purple coral, surrounded by purple UI wireframes and interface icons.

Keyboard access must be built into every interaction

An accessible interactive website lets people reach, understand and operate every control with a keyboard or another non-mouse input method. Native browser elements are often the safest starting point because browsers already support keyboard operation for controls such as dropdown selections. Custom controls can still be used, but they need careful attention: users must be able to operate them by keyboard and screen readers must be able to recognise them.

Mouse access is only one way to navigate a technical content experience. Visitors may use keyboards, touch devices, screen readers or other assistive technologies, and the same information must remain available across those routes. Keyboard navigation is therefore not a later accessibility check. It is a core requirement for the information architecture, interaction design and development of an interactive data story, guided journey, calculator or assessment tool.

Sources: Designing and developing web experiences for everyone

Controllable content protects comprehension and access

Interactive content becomes harder to use when movement, timing or complex navigation prevents people from reading, concentrating or choosing their own route. Auto-rotating carousels can be particularly difficult for people who need more time to understand content, including readers using a second language. Slow connections, bright mobile environments and different devices can also affect whether an interactive website remains usable.

Design for adaptation by checking how the experience behaves across browsers, devices, connectivity conditions and input methods. Give users enough contrast to read content, make navigation clear, and avoid assuming that every visitor can use a mouse. Progressive disclosure should reveal detail at a manageable pace, not hide essential information behind interactions that some users cannot operate. Retrofitting inclusion late in a project is difficult when deadlines are tight, so accessible UX needs to shape the experience before build decisions are fixed.

Sources: Designing and developing web experiences for everyone

Inclusive interaction belongs in the design brief, not the final checklist

We believe an interactive website should earn every interaction by making complex content clearer without excluding people who use keyboards, screen readers or different devices. A provider should involve development early, understand the limits of custom controls and account for contrast, responsiveness and multiple input methods before visual decisions become expensive to change. We bring designers and developers together from the start rather than separating creative and technical work into silos. On This is IBM, created to celebrate IBM in the UK and Ireland, development input from the beginning helped make inclusion a priority across colour, contrast, devices and input methods. That approach helps prevent accessibility from becoming a late-stage box-ticking exercise.

Sources: Designing and developing web experiences for everyone

Stats

61% of B2B buyers preferred an overall rep-free buying experience in a 2024 survey.

Gartner

FAQs

What controls should work with a keyboard on an interactive website?

Every control needed to navigate, reveal content or complete an interaction should be usable without a mouse. Native browser controls are a useful default because they support keyboard access, while custom controls require deliberate work to ensure keyboard operation and screen-reader recognition. The accessible route should provide access to the same information, not a reduced substitute.

Are custom interactive controls accessible?

Custom interactive controls can be accessible, but they are harder to implement well than native browser elements. A custom design needs careful attention to keyboard use and whether screen readers can recognise the control. Styling freedom should not take priority over equal access and usability.

Should an interactive website use auto-rotating content?

Auto-rotating content can create access and comprehension problems when people need more time to read or understand what is on screen. Timed movement can be especially difficult for visitors with concentration, language or environmental constraints. Content should allow people to proceed at a pace that works for them.

When should accessibility be considered in an interactive website project?

Accessibility should shape the project from the earliest design and development decisions. Early collaboration helps account for contrast, devices and input methods before constraints are embedded in the build. Adding inclusion late can be difficult when deadlines leave little room for changes.

Glossary

Native browser elements
Native browser elements are built-in web controls, such as dropdown selections, whose standard behaviour already supports keyboard use. They provide a more reliable accessibility foundation than recreating a control from scratch.