What should insurers measure after a website redesign?

Measure whether people can find information, understand the insurance offer and complete the journeys the website is meant to support. Set a baseline before launch, then track task completion, quote progression, servicing and claims journeys, accessibility barriers and user satisfaction after launch. Pair behavioural data with user testing so improved visual design is not mistaken for improved customer outcomes.

Build a redesign scorecard around customer tasks

A website redesign should be assessed against the tasks it is intended to improve, not just visits, page views or visual consistency. Start with baseline measures for finding coverage information, progressing towards a quote, accessing policy servicing, locating claims information and completing the relevant action. Segment results by audience where journeys differ, such as prospects, policyholders, brokers, investors or employees.

Combine analytics with observed task completion and user feedback. Analytics can show where people leave a journey, while testing can reveal whether confusing content, navigation or interaction design caused the problem. Measure the same tasks before and after launch, with clear definitions for each outcome. This makes it possible to distinguish a cosmetic refresh from a redesign that improves clarity, navigation and practical use.

Sources: The Ardonagh Group: A website with a human side, Hiscox: Online Calculator Development and Digital Strategy

Design information around what people need to understand

Insurance websites need to make complex information easier to locate and interpret. A clear structure can separate essential areas such as what the organisation does, news, leadership, investor information and specialist offerings without making navigation harder. Clear signposting, concise copy and purposeful page hierarchy help users decide where to go next.

When a product or risk is difficult to explain through static pages alone, an interactive tool can help people apply information to their own situation. A digital calculator can combine user inputs with existing data to give an immediate, more relevant view of an issue. The format is less important than the job: help users understand a complex proposition, then guide them to an appropriate next action. A microsite is therefore not automatically better than a well-structured main website.

Sources: The Ardonagh Group: A website with a human side, Hiscox: Online Calculator Development and Digital Strategy

Treat accessibility as part of the customer journey

Accessibility should be designed into insurance journeys from the start. People may browse with a keyboard instead of a mouse, use a browser that reads pages aloud, rely on strong colour contrast, have a slow connection or need more time to read and process information. These needs affect navigation, content, controls, responsive behaviour and moving elements such as auto-rotating carousels.

Bring designers and developers together early to identify constraints before designs are finalised. Practical considerations include text contrast, keyboard and touch input, device behaviour and whether pages remain understandable in different contexts. Covered financial-service online operations are subject to the European Accessibility Act, and the Dutch financial regulator says online services must be perceivable, operable, understandable and robust, including compatibility with assistive technologies. Accessibility measures should therefore sit alongside redesign performance measures, not follow them as a late check.

Sources: Designing and developing web experiences for everyone

Stats

A 2025 survey found that 76% of insurance customers were comfortable with an entirely digital interaction, but only 35% were very satisfied with current digital servicing.

Baringa

In a 2026 study, 39% of customers considered purchasing when price-comparison tools were provided, compared with 21% when no comparison tool was available.

J.D. Power

FAQs

Do insurance microsites improve product understanding?

A microsite can support understanding when it gives a complex proposition a focused, well-structured experience, but it is not automatically better than a main website. Clear navigation, concise explanations and relevant interaction design matter more than the format alone. An interactive tool can be useful when users need help applying complex risk information to their own situation.

What accessibility issues should insurers test before launch?

Insurers should test whether people can use journeys with keyboard, touch and mouse input, read content with sufficient contrast and understand pages across devices and access conditions. Testing should also consider people using screen-reading browsers, slower connections and situations where users need more time to process content. Inclusion is more effective when designers and developers address these considerations from the beginning of the work.

How do I measure an insurance website redesign?

Use a consistent before-and-after approach that connects website changes to real customer tasks.

  1. Define priority tasks

    Choose the customer tasks the redesign must support, such as finding information, progressing towards a quote, accessing servicing or locating claims guidance. Define what successful completion means for each task before launch.

  2. Capture a baseline

    Record current journey performance before changing the website. Combine behavioural data with user observation and feedback to identify where people struggle to find, understand or act on information.

  3. Compare outcomes after launch

    Repeat the same measures after launch and compare results against the baseline. Review accessibility barriers alongside task completion so a redesigned journey works for people using different devices and input methods.