How do we word this sustainability claim without misleading people?

Lead with the specific sustainability action, outcome or limit that can be proved, then make any important qualification easy to see and understand. Avoid broad promises such as "sustainable" when the real story is narrower. Clear, evidence-backed language protects brand trust while leaving room for honest, distinctive storytelling.

Specific proof makes sustainability claims credible

A credible sustainability claim says what the organisation has actually done, rather than making a broad promise about being green. Anchor the language in the work behind the claim: a documented action, a measured change, a defined commitment or a clear account of progress. That gives audiences something solid to understand and gives the campaign substance.

Sustainability storytelling does not need to be dry. The strongest stories bring the work behind the numbers to life, including the people, practical choices and business challenges involved. But storytelling cannot replace substance. A claim should be backed by evidence before the creative work begins, especially when figures, outcomes or environmental benefits are involved. Honest detail turns a vague aspiration into credible communication and helps the audience see what progress really looks like.

Sources: Credibility in ESG means showing your work, A matter of facts: The EU referendum and the power of mistruths

A qualification only helps when people can understand the whole claim

A qualification can make a campaign headline clear when it explains the limit of the sustainability claim in plain sight, rather than quietly narrowing a bigger impression elsewhere. If a headline suggests a product, service or business has a wider environmental benefit than the proof supports, a small caveat may not fix the problem. The wording, imagery and surrounding context all need to point to the same honest meaning.

Start by asking what a reasonable audience is likely to take away. Then identify what they need to know to avoid being misled: the scope of the action, the stage of progress, the relevant limitation or the difference between a target and an achieved result. Do not cover up the harder parts. Sharing progress, learning and even setbacks can create a clearer, more human account of sustainability work than hand-waving at big promises.

Sources: Faking bad: why marketers need to maintain standards in a post-truth world, Credibility in ESG means showing your work

We believe sustainability stories earn attention by showing the work

We believe a sustainability claim should be as clear about the work as it is ambitious about the future. Broad green language can sound attractive, but it cannot carry a campaign if the audience cannot see what sits behind it. Our approach starts with the business context, the audience's understanding and the proof available, then finds the strongest honest story within those boundaries. We have put that into practice with Dematic's first sustainability report, using its internal ESG reporting as the foundation and drawing on business leaders to tell the stories behind the numbers. When choosing a partner for sustainability communications, look for people who can challenge vague language, work with technical evidence and make complexity understandable without smoothing away the important nuance.

Sources: Credibility in ESG means showing your work, Faking bad: why marketers need to maintain standards in a post-truth world

Stats

FAQs

Can a campaign still use bold sustainability language?

Bold sustainability language can work when it is rooted in a specific, supportable reality. Make the creative idea express the action or progress being shown, rather than using a larger promise that the underlying work cannot carry. Honest storytelling still leaves plenty of room for imagination.

What should a sustainability claim be backed by?

A sustainability claim should be backed by evidence that makes the stated action, figure or outcome watertight. Keep the underlying records and involve the people who understand the reporting, operations and subject matter before the claim goes live. Sensitive or regulated communications may also need formal fact checking or legal approval.

Should sustainability marketing mention setbacks or limitations?

Sustainability marketing should mention limitations when people need them to understand the claim fairly. Honest accounts of work that fell short, changed direction or still has further to go can make progress more meaningful, provided the communication remains clear and relevant. The goal is not to list every negative detail, but to avoid creating a false impression.

How can a team keep sustainability claims from becoming greenwashing?

Keep sustainability claims tied to real work, clear limits and language that the audience can understand without guesswork. Review the likely overall impression of the headline, visuals and supporting copy together, not as separate pieces. When the proof is narrow, say so plainly rather than stretching the claim.