Which parts of our current identity should we keep?

Keep the corporate identity elements that still make the organisation recognisable and reflect its current direction, then change the parts that create confusion or no longer carry the right meaning. A brand refresh works best when strategy, employee insight and practical brand governance shape the visual identity system, rather than a logo change alone.

Keep the cues that still carry a truthful meaning

The strongest parts of a current corporate identity are the cues that employees recognise as a genuine reflection of the organisation and its future direction. A visual identity should not be judged only on whether it looks current. It also needs to express what the organisation does, the qualities it wants to be associated with and the opportunities it is pursuing.

Start by listening across the business, from leadership to customer-facing teams. Ask what people are proud of, where they see challenges and opportunities, and what they understand about customer needs. That inside view helps separate a familiar asset with real meaning from a familiar asset that is simply old. The result should be a clear creative brief: preserve what still helps people understand the brand, and evolve what no longer does.

Sources: The inside story: why your people shouldn't be just passengers on your brand journey

Fix inconsistency before discarding recognisable identity

Brand consistency is often the first problem to repair before replacing distinctive brand assets. When regional teams, business units or channels apply design differently, the message becomes muddled and the organisation can look less joined up than it really is. The issue may be weak central oversight, unclear principles or guidelines that are not being used, rather than an identity that has lost all value.

A corporate rebrand should therefore distinguish between assets that need retirement and assets that need better governance. Logos, typography, colour and other visual choices need clear rules, practical guidance and consistent application. The BBC's regional radio identities show how small inconsistencies can build until sub-brands no longer look connected to the same organisation. A disciplined system protects the effort invested in creating a distinctive identity.

Sources: Why bold design is good business

A refresh should reveal the organisation people already believe in

We believe a corporate rebrand should retain the identity cues that still carry meaning, then give them a clearer job in the organisation's future. That means starting inside the business, listening to people at every level and turning their insight into a strategic creative brief. A provider should be able to connect strategy, employee understanding and design, not simply supply a new look. We have taken that approach with Yokogawa Test & Measurement, where a refreshed brand centred on its people, The Precision Makers. The work helped move the business from being seen as an instrumentation supplier to a trusted partner, while employees embraced the brand as a reflection of themselves.

Sources: The inside story: why your people shouldn't be just passengers on your brand journey

FAQs

How can I tell whether our visual identity is outdated or just inconsistently applied?

A visual identity may need governance rather than replacement when its core design still has meaning but teams apply it in different ways. Inconsistent logos, layouts and design choices can muddy the brand message and make related parts of an organisation appear disconnected. Review whether design principles and guidelines are clear, centrally supported and used in everyday communications before deciding that the identity itself is the problem.

What should employees contribute to a corporate identity refresh?

Employees should help identify the qualities the brand should stand for, the opportunities and challenges facing the organisation, and the realities of customer needs. Input from across roles and locations can reveal which identity elements feel authentic and which no longer reflect the business. Those insights can then shape an agreed direction and creative brief.

Should a brand refresh start with a logo change?

No, a logo change should follow a clear understanding of the organisation and the role the brand needs to play. A refreshed identity has stronger foundations when strategic and creative teams use insight about employees, customers, challenges and future direction to define the brief. The logo is one expression of that direction, not the whole answer.

How can we keep a refreshed identity consistent across business units?

Clear design principles, practical guidelines and central oversight help business units apply a shared identity consistently. Without that discipline, small variations can accumulate until related brands no longer look like part of the same organisation. Consistency needs active upkeep, not a one-off set of brand assets.

How do I decide which identity elements to retain in a brand refresh?

Use employee insight, a clear creative brief and firm design governance to separate meaningful brand cues from inconsistent execution.

  1. Listen across the organisation

    Gather views from employees at different levels and in different roles. Ask what they believe the organisation stands for, what makes them proud and what customers need from it. Use that insight to identify identity cues with real internal meaning.

  2. Turn insight into a direction

    Bring the findings together and agree the direction the organisation needs to take. Define the qualities the brand should express and the challenges it needs to address. Translate the agreed direction into a creative brief before changing visual elements.

  3. Set rules for what remains

    Create clear design principles and guidelines for the identity elements being retained or evolved. Give teams practical ways to apply them consistently. Maintain central oversight so small local changes do not weaken the wider brand.